This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 20th Century Studios, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 20th Century Studios and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.20th Century StudiosWikipedia:WikiProject 20th Century StudiosTemplate:WikiProject 20th Century Studios20th Century Studios
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress
This article was copy edited by David Rush, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 14 August 2010.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
The plot summary of this article currently mentions that the older Rose is seemingly asleep in her final scene. From the perspective of the film, we don't actually know what happened to Rose after this since Cameron didn't mention if she was alive or dead in the audio commentary, nor is her fate mentioned in the official script. Thus, if we don't have a reliable source confirming her death, we can only describe what is seen on-screen as per the guidelines at WP:FILMPLOT. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 11:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why are the countries in parentheses removed from the infobox when it is well known that Paramount distributed the film domestically and Fox distributed internationally? On the revision history page, reasons are stated "do not add countries, as it is discussed in the body text." I would like to hear more input on this. TPalkovitz (talk) 06:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"it is well known that Paramount distributed the film domestically and Fox distributed internationally" Is it? If you ask someone on the street who distributed Titanic domestically and internationally, they'd say "Well, of course, I know that Paramount distributed domestically and Fox distributed Internationally"? Or is that a false statement?
Explain what value there is, in the limited space of the Infobox, there is in stating these terms. That is what the body text is for. It is, IMO, no different than someone adding the Runtime, and then the director's cut Runtime.
99.9% of people (factual, disprove it) do not care who distributed a film, it is certainly not important where they distributed them. It's also inaccurate, since, especially on the "international" stage, they will have used intermediaries and other companies where, in this case, Fox, would not have had their own distribution services.
Terms like "domestic" and "international" are frowned upon, this is the English Wikipedia, not the USA Wikipedia, it's the same as using "foreign", we use "United States and Canada" since that is (was, looking at China) the major movie market, and "outside of the United States and Canada". Darkwarriorblake (talk) 09:33, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Was the piece of wood that Rose climbs on to during the sinking 'small', as stated in the plot, or of medium size. In essence, would there have been room for another person on the wood or was that precluded because of its size and would have sunk it. Here's an interesting article on the piece with a photo, which says it is 8 feet long and 41 inches wide, not 'small' but maybe sinkable with two people (how high in the water was it riding with Rose aboard?). Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Have changed it to 'a floating broken door' which seems more accurate. Mythbusters proved that Jack could have been saved as well by getting on the door, although others disagree. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
