User talk:Charles Matthews
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
CorruptionOfEconomics
[edit]Thank you so much, Charles, for creating the article page.
If you are interested as a "lead author" there is a compiled version of the text here https://globalartscollective.org/corruption-of-economics.htm#top, or I cand lend you a copy of the second edition, 2022, from Shepheard-Walwyn Ltd.
- PS. I just seen the latest version. You are obviously interested...
Janosabel (talk) 23:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- I will be able to get a library copy of the book. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Charles. Would it be enough for now to make Capitalism As Power into a stub class? Janosabel (talk) 19:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- I will be able to get a library copy of the book. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings!
[edit]
.JPG)
Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2025! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Six years! |
|---|
Best wishes for the season, and beyond! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 66
[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 66, November – December 2024
- Les Jours and East View Press join the library
- Tech tip: Newspapers.com
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --17:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Capital as Power
[edit]- Hello again. Charles, there is a review of Capital as Power here https://capitalaspower.com/2022/01/owen-lynch-book-review-capital-as-power/
- Janosabel (talk) 23:00, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Under WP:UGC, that review is unlikely to be accepted as a reliable source. I have found a review by Salvador Santino Regilme that will be useful. Charles Matthews (talk) 04:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Good! Thank you. Janosabel (talk) 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Under WP:UGC, that review is unlikely to be accepted as a reliable source. I have found a review by Salvador Santino Regilme that will be useful. Charles Matthews (talk) 04:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
What more should I do to make this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Janosabel/sandbox#Capital_As_Power%E2%80%94A_Study_of_Order_and_Creorder into a Stub class entry?
- At present it reads like an essay. WP:TONE says that "Articles and other encyclopedic content should be written in a formal tone". Below that, under WP:PRONOUN, it says "Articles should not be written from a first- or second-person perspective." So when you write "I", there is a problem.
- What I saw in the review was a reference to the Cambridge capital controversy. This is helpful background. If Capital as Power builds on some positions taken in that controversy, there should be a way to explain the argument of the book more simply. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)